Week 03: Perception without Awareness?
Commencing Monday 19th October 2020
Seminar Task on yyrama
- Complete and submit your mini-essay at least 24 hours before your seminar in Week 03.
- Complete and submit your peer review at least 24 hours before your seminar in Week 03.
- Check your work for any feedback immediately before the seminar.
- Re-read your work before the seminar (so you can answer questions about it).
- Ensure you can refer back to what you submitted during the seminar.
Note that the seminar tasks are typically on topics from previous weeks.
Not sure what to do? Check this guide to the seminar tasks (this is the same each week).
Live Online Whole-Class Meeting
- Add messages with your questions before the meeting in the teams channel for the lectures.
- Attend the meeting on Thursday at 12 (link to join).
Recorded Lectures
- Make use of the Lecture 05 recordings (or the backup recordings if the main recordings do not work for you); or, if you prefer, just the slide text.
- Review your notes from Lecture 05.
- Make use of the Lecture 06 recordings (or the backup recordings if the main recordings do not work for you); or, if you prefer, just the slide text.
- Review your notes from Lecture 06.
- Make use of the Week 03 Questions recordings (or the backup recordings if the main recordings do not work for you); or, if you prefer, just the slide text.
- Review your notes from Week 03 Questions.
Not sure what to do with the lectures? Check this guide to using lectures (this is the same each week).
In-Lecture Micro Tasks on Zoxiy
Complete these while studying the recorded lectures, ideally with a partner. Once you have followed the lectures, you will already have done these.
Not sure how to complete the in-lecture micro tasks? Check this guide to the micro tasks (this is the same each week).
Assessed work to submit
There is no assessed work due this week. (But to be sure, please check on tabula as this is the only authoritative source for deadlines.)
Optional reading from the lectures
These are the readings from this week’s lectures. These are the same as the readings listed in the lecture outlines. You are not required to do any of this reading. You may want to do attempt some of this reading in advance, or you might read it as part of your revision. The only required reading is that associated with the seminar tasks.
- Firestone, C. and Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39.
- Burke, Luke. ‘On the Tunnel Effect’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 4, no. 3 (1952): 121–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215208416611.
- Fodor, Jerry. ‘Observation Reconsidered’. Philosophy of Science 51, no. 1 (1984): 23–43.
- Bruner, Jerome, and Cecile Goodman. ‘Value and Need as Organizing Factors in Perception’. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 42, no. 1 (1947): 33–44.
- Witzel, Christoph. ‘An Easy Way to Show Memory Color Effects’: I-Perception, 1 August 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516663751.
- Witzel, C., M. Olkkonen, and K. R. Gegenfurtner. ‘Memory Colours Affect Colour Appearance.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 39 (2016): e262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002587.
- Olkkonen, Maria, Thorsten Hansen, and Karl R. Gegenfurtner. ‘Color Appearance of Familiar Objects: Effects of Object Shape, Texture, and Illumination Changes’. Journal of Vision 8, no. 5 (2008): 13–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.5.13.
- Levin, Daniel T., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. ‘Distortions in the Perceived Lightness of Faces: The Role of Race Categories’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135, no. 4 (2006): 501–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.501.
- Carter, Launor, and Kermit Schooler. ‘Value, Need, and Other Factors in Perception’. Psychological Review 56, no. 4 (1949): 200–207.
- Valenti, J. J., and Chaz Firestone. ‘Finding the “Odd One out”: Memory Color Effects and the Logic of Appearance’. Cognition 191 (2019): 103934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.003.
- Firestone, Chaz, and Brian J. Scholl. ‘Can You Experience “Top-down” Effects on Perception?: The Case of Race Categories and Perceived Lightness’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22, no. 3 (2015): 694–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0711-5.
- Baker, Lewis J., and Daniel T. Levin. ‘The Face-Race Lightness Illusion Is Not Driven by Low-Level Stimulus Properties: An Empirical Reply to Firestone and Scholl (2014)’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23, no. 6 (2016): 1989–95. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1048-z.
- Kelber, A., Vorobyev, M., and Osorio, D. (2003). Animal colour vision – behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biological Reviews, 78(01):81–118.
- Sidis, B. (1898). The psychology of suggestion. Appleton, New York.
- Cowey, A. (2010). The blindsight saga. Experimental Brain Research, 200(1):3–24.
- Marcel, A. J. (1998). Blindsight and shape perception: Deficit of visual consciousness or of visual function? Brain, 121(8):1565–1588.
- Weiskrantz, L., Barbur, J. L., and Sahraie, A. (1995). Parameters affecting conscious versus unconscious visual discrimination with damage to the visual cortex (V1). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(13):6122–6126.
- Shea, N. and Frith, C. D. (2016). Dual-process theories and consciousness: The case for ‘Type Zero’ cognition. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2016(1).
- Kosslyn, Stephen M., William L. Thompson, Maria F. Costantini-Ferrando, Nathaniel M. Alpert, and David Spiegel. ‘Hypnotic Visual Illusion Alters Color Processing in the Brain’. American Journal of Psychiatry 157, no. 8 (1 August 2000): 1279–84. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1279.
- Koivisto, Mika, Svetlana Kirjanen, Antti Revonsuo, and Sakari Kallio. ‘A Preconscious Neural Mechanism of Hypnotically Altered Colors: A Double Case Study’. PLOS ONE 8, no. 8 (5 August 2013): e70900. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070900.
- Kadosh, Roi Cohen, Avishai Henik, Andres Catena, Vincent Walsh, and Luis J. Fuentes. ‘Induced Cross-Modal Synaesthetic Experience Without Abnormal Neuronal Connections’: Psychological Science, 1 February 2009.
- Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: an Essay on Faculty Psychology. Bradford book. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass ; London.
What the Lectures Cover in Week 03
Lecture 05
Cognitive Penetration: Recap
A quick recap on: what we understand by the claim that cognition penetrates perception; why this is significant; and our next steps.
Reading (optional): Firestone, C. and Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for “top-down” effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39.
--- do one micro task for this unit
The Case Against the Cognitive Penetration of Perception
The Tunnel Effect (Burke, 1952) provides one demonstration of how your thoughts appear unable to influence your perception. A solid blue circle goes into a tunnel, and an orange square outline emerges. Despite knowing that these cannot be the same object, a single continuous movement is perceived. If what you believe or know could affect what you perceive, it’s influence should be apparent this case. The fact that it is not makes it improbable that cognition penetrates perception.
Reading (optional):
- Burke, Luke. ‘On the Tunnel Effect’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 4, no. 3 (1952): 121–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215208416611.
- Fodor, Jerry. ‘Observation Reconsidered’. Philosophy of Science 51, no. 1 (1984): 23–43.
The Case For the Cognitive Penetration of Perception
What evidence supports the view that cognition penetrates perception? Some early findings reported by Bruner and Goodman (1947) provide a template for later research. More recently, Levin & Banaji (2006) appear to have shown that your beliefs about race categories can influence your perception of the lightness of a face. This is among the best, most direct evidence for the view that cognition penetrates perception.
Reading (optional):
- Bruner, Jerome, and Cecile Goodman. ‘Value and Need as Organizing Factors in Perception’. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 42, no. 1 (1947): 33–44.
- Witzel, Christoph. ‘An Easy Way to Show Memory Color Effects’: I-Perception, 1 August 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516663751.
- Witzel, C., M. Olkkonen, and K. R. Gegenfurtner. ‘Memory Colours Affect Colour Appearance.’ Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 39 (2016): e262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002587.
- Olkkonen, Maria, Thorsten Hansen, and Karl R. Gegenfurtner. ‘Color Appearance of Familiar Objects: Effects of Object Shape, Texture, and Illumination Changes’. Journal of Vision 8, no. 5 (2008): 13–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.5.13.
- Levin, Daniel T., and Mahzarin R. Banaji. ‘Distortions in the Perceived Lightness of Faces: The Role of Race Categories’. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135, no. 4 (2006): 501–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.501.
--- do one micro task for this unit
Cognitive Penetration: Evaluation and Conclusion
We have seen that there is a body of evidence in favour of the view that cognition penetrates perception, and also a body of evidence in favour of the converse. How should we respond to this dilemma? By considering how well each body of evidence has stood up to further experimental scruitiny, we can reach a robust conclusion.
Reading (optional):
- Carter, Launor, and Kermit Schooler. ‘Value, Need, and Other Factors in Perception’. Psychological Review 56, no. 4 (1949): 200–207.
- Valenti, J. J., and Chaz Firestone. ‘Finding the “Odd One out”: Memory Color Effects and the Logic of Appearance’. Cognition 191 (2019): 103934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.003.
- Firestone, Chaz, and Brian J. Scholl. ‘Can You Experience “Top-down” Effects on Perception?: The Case of Race Categories and Perceived Lightness’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22, no. 3 (2015): 694–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0711-5.
- Baker, Lewis J., and Daniel T. Levin. ‘The Face-Race Lightness Illusion Is Not Driven by Low-Level Stimulus Properties: An Empirical Reply to Firestone and Scholl (2014)’. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 23, no. 6 (2016): 1989–95. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1048-z.
Lecture 06
Intro to the Question about Awareness
Most central features of human life, such as disease, reproduction, cooperation, language and politics can be investigated. In each case there are basic facts that most researchers accept and broad agreement about methods of investigation. None of this holds in the case of awareness (or consciousness, as it is sometimes called). If we are ever to understand what it is, we need to by start thinking about what roles awareness plays. Why does it matter that we are sometimes perceptually aware of things?
Reading (optional): Kelber, A., Vorobyev, M., and Osorio, D. (2003). Animal colour vision – behavioural tests and physiological concepts. Biological Reviews, 78(01):81–118.
A Secondary Subwaking Self?
According to what I will call the Simple Hypothesis, Perceptual awareness enables us to identify things and report what we have identified. Sidis (1898) challenges the Simple Hypothesis with an experiment on perception without awareness.
Reading (optional): Sidis, B. (1898). The psychology of suggestion. Appleton, New York.
--- do one micro task for this unit
Blindsight
Blindsight is ‘the ability of patients with absolute, clinically established, visual field defects caused by occipital cortical damage to detect, localize, and discriminate visual stimuli despite being phenomenally visually unaware of them’ (Cowey, 2010).
Reading (optional):
- Cowey, A. (2010). The blindsight saga. Experimental Brain Research, 200(1):3–24.
- Marcel, A. J. (1998). Blindsight and shape perception: Deficit of visual consciousness or of visual function? Brain, 121(8):1565–1588.
- Weiskrantz, L., Barbur, J. L., and Sahraie, A. (1995). Parameters affecting conscious versus unconscious visual discrimination with damage to the visual cortex (V1). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92(13):6122–6126.
- Shea, N. and Frith, C. D. (2016). Dual-process theories and consciousness: The case for ‘Type Zero’ cognition. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2016(1).
--- do 2 micro tasks for this unit
Awareness: First Interim Conclusion
What are the functions of perceptual awareness? The Simplest Idea is that Perceptual awareness enables control of action. But we have already seen three objections to this Idea.
Week 03 Questions
Recording of Whole-Class Live Question Session
The whole-class live online question session in is based on questions on the topic of this weeks’ lectures posed in advance in the teams channel.
Reading (optional):
- Kosslyn, Stephen M., William L. Thompson, Maria F. Costantini-Ferrando, Nathaniel M. Alpert, and David Spiegel. ‘Hypnotic Visual Illusion Alters Color Processing in the Brain’. American Journal of Psychiatry 157, no. 8 (1 August 2000): 1279–84. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1279.
- Koivisto, Mika, Svetlana Kirjanen, Antti Revonsuo, and Sakari Kallio. ‘A Preconscious Neural Mechanism of Hypnotically Altered Colors: A Double Case Study’. PLOS ONE 8, no. 8 (5 August 2013): e70900. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070900.
- Kadosh, Roi Cohen, Avishai Henik, Andres Catena, Vincent Walsh, and Luis J. Fuentes. ‘Induced Cross-Modal Synaesthetic Experience Without Abnormal Neuronal Connections’: Psychological Science, 1 February 2009.
- Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind: an Essay on Faculty Psychology. Bradford book. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass ; London.
Not what you were looking for?
There is also ...
- a complete week-by-week guide;
- an outline of lectures;
- an index of weeks;
- links for online seminars;
- a list of seminar tasks on yyrama; and
- the in-lecture micro tasks on zoxiy.
... or go to
- Week 01: Points of View
(5th Oct)
- Week 02: Cognitive Penetration
(12th Oct)
- Week 03: Perception without Awareness?
(19th Oct)
- Week 04: Sense and Reference
(26th Oct)
- Week 05: Action
(2nd Nov)
- Week 07: Action
(16th Nov)
- Week 08: Personal Identity
(23rd Nov)
- Week 09: Induction
(30th Nov)
- Week 10: Revision and Extensions
(7th Dec)