Mind and Reality

--- lecturer: [email protected]

A course at the University of Warwick.

Week 08: Personal Identity

Commencing Monday 23rd November 2020


Seminar Task on yyrama

Note that the seminar tasks are typically on topics from previous weeks.

Not sure what to do? Check this guide to the seminar tasks (this is the same each week).

Live Online Whole-Class Meeting

Recorded Lectures

Not sure what to do with the lectures? Check this guide to using lectures (this is the same each week).

In-Lecture Micro Tasks on Zoxiy

Complete these while studying the recorded lectures, ideally with a partner. Once you have followed the lectures, you will already have done these.

Not sure how to complete the in-lecture micro tasks? Check this guide to the micro tasks (this is the same each week).

Assessed work to submit

  • Questions for the take-home exam might be due on Monday of this week, I think.
  • Check the deadline on tabula. (Tabula is the only authoritative source for deadlines.)
  • Submit your work using tabula.

Please remember that all assessed work will only be marked if you submit it using tabula.

Optional reading from the lectures

These are the readings from this week’s lectures. These are the same as the readings listed in the lecture outlines. You are not required to do any of this reading. You may want to do attempt some of this reading in advance, or you might read it as part of your revision. The only required reading is that associated with the seminar tasks.

  • Olson, E. T. (2019). Personal Identity. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, fall 2019 edition.
  • Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • Olson, E. T. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford.
  • Olson, E. T. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Shoemaker, D. (2019). Personal Identity and Ethics. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2019 edition.
  • (hard) Sider, T. (2001). Criteria of Personal Identity and the Limits of Conceptual Analysis. Nouˆs, 35(s15):189–209
  • Brand, Bethany L., Vedat Sar, Pam Stavropoulos, Christa Krüger, Marilyn Korzekwa, Alfonso Martínez-Taboas, and Warwick Middleton. ‘Separating Fact from Fiction: An Empirical Examination of Six Myths about Dissociative Identity Disorder’. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 24, no. 4 (2016): 257–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000100.

What the Lectures Cover in Week 08

Lecture 13

Personal Identity: The Question

What is metaphysically necessary for your survival? Or, to put the question as Olson (2019) does, ‘If a person exists at one time and something exists at another time, under what possible circumstances is it the case that the person is the thing?’

Reading (optional): Olson, E. T. (2019). Personal Identity. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, fall 2019 edition.

--- do 2 micro tasks for this unit

Numerical Identity

What is the question of personal identity a question about? One quite natural suggestion: it is about numerical identity. The question is about the circumstances under which a person at one time is numerically identical to a person at another time. But can this be right? According to David Lewis, Numerical ‘identity is utterly simple and unproblematic.’ If Lewis is right, either there is no problem of personal identity, or, if there is a problem, it is not a problem about numerical identity.

Reading (optional): Olson, E. T. (2019). Personal Identity. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, fall 2019 edition.

--- do one micro task for this unit

Psychological Continuity

According to psychological continuity views of personal identity, necessarily, a person existing at one time is a person existing at another time if and only if the first mentioned person can, at the first time, remember an experience the second mentioned person has at the second time, or vice versa.

Reading (optional): Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

--- do one micro task for this unit

Lecture 14

Biological Continuity

According to biological continuity views of personal identity, necessarily, a person existing at one time is a thing existing at another time if and only if the first mentioned person’s biological organism is continuous with the second thing’s biological organism.

Reading (optional): Olson, E. T. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford.

--- do 2 micro tasks for this unit

Does Identity Matter?

If ‘the relations of practical concerns that typically go along with our identity through time are closely connected with psychological continuity [...], then the Biological Approach does have an interesting ethical consequence, namely that those practical relations are not necessarily connected with numerical identity’ (Olson, 1997 p. 70).

Reading (optional): Olson, E. T. (1997). The human animal: Personal identity without psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Psychological Continuity and Fission

If you could be psychologically continuous with two distinct future individuals (that is, if fission is possible), then psychological continuity views of personal identity cannot be correct.

Reading (optional): Shoemaker, D. (2019). Personal Identity and Ethics. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, winter 2019 edition.

Conclusion

Lewis was right, ‘Identity is utterly simple and unproblematic’. Or so I claim. But maybe you can show this is wrong.

Reading (optional): (hard) Sider, T. (2001). Criteria of Personal Identity and the Limits of Conceptual Analysis. Nouˆs, 35(s15):189–209

Week 07 Questions

Recording of Whole-Class Live Question Session

The whole-class live online question session in is based on questions on the topic of this weeks’ lectures posed in advance in the teams channel.

Reading (optional): Brand, Bethany L., Vedat Sar, Pam Stavropoulos, Christa Krüger, Marilyn Korzekwa, Alfonso Martínez-Taboas, and Warwick Middleton. ‘Separating Fact from Fiction: An Empirical Examination of Six Myths about Dissociative Identity Disorder’. Harvard Review of Psychiatry 24, no. 4 (2016): 257–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000100.


Last updated at Thu Dec 10 2020 22:19:42 GMT+0000 (Greenwich Mean Time)